Dear Nat:)
You've discovered the guestbook page.
As in the past used to say, my dear father, "never too late if that is good."
But if you have to read all the messages that the fans have written, you can suffer a fading and to finish with a tremendous headache:blink: .
I only lament, that you have not discovered the guestbook, two years ago, and thus to have the possibility that had you read my post (sigh!). Well, is a pity (another sigh!) .

I take advantage of this post to give my congratulations to all the fans that have received in the guestbook a your answer. Seriously!, congratulations to all.

Now I only wish you Nat is a great performance in your classes with Apple, and you pleasantly surprised us with some new informatics knowledge.
Yours sincerely.
Amparo.

This is in response to Amparo's comments, mainly- Don't feel too bad that your guest-book entry was two years ago. I just made an entry two or three days ago, and was one of the few to receive no response (sigh). I admit this is a bit disappointing, but I don't take it personally. Really.

Nat, you can't be expected to answer each and every guest book posting- This could come to feel like an obligation and a burden, not to mention wearing you out. You are a talented and lovely man, and I hope the guest book entries mainly serve to let you know people around the world (even in India) care about you, appreciate your work, and wish you the very best.

Warmest regards,
Diane Chakko

This is in response to previous Diane's comments.
You do not feel bad please. If Nat, do not respond to you in the guest book is because he is not aware of the message. If you see the messages they are close together, and it becomes clear that he will jump unintentionally, he did not purposely , really. I think he should be a little giddy with so much message.
So you do not feel bad, OK?.
Lovely greetings.
Amparo.

Dear Amparo,

Thanks, it's very sweet of you to comfort me. I don't feel bad, I understand it's nothing personal! I think it shows what a nice guy Nat is to try and answer messages at all. I also think he doesn't quite realize the effect he has on people, and he never dreamed his thoughtfulness would result in the "little chaos" as you put it.

Affectionately,
Diane

Hi Diane,

Sorry that Nat didn't find your message. I think that it's sweet that he is trying to answer any of them at all....also that he's taking computer classes to try to learn. I have a couple of friends in the arts, one a soloist at the Houston Opera, and another in the Dallas Symphony. Both were child prodigies and so focused in their careers from an early age that they didn't really get time to learn anything else, to their great regret. Both have had to sacrifice a lot in the way of family time, also.
Knowing them has made me appreciate what professional artists have to balance in their personal lives to give their audiences a few hours of escape from their own mundane existences.
I do think that it would be pretty neat if Nat would take an alias and join our forum, though. He might get a big laugh out of some of our comments.
Best regards, Donna Rae