Injustice

More
09 May 2011 21:47 #1109393477 by Nenne
Replied by Nenne on topic Re: Injustice
Dear Claudia,:)

I agree, the Lynley car problem shouldn't be discussed here. So I've started a new thread in the Lynley section. Hope it'll work.

Injustice seem to be very interesting and perhaps very different from what we are used to see Nat in. Can't wait.:blink:

Cheers,

Nenne

PS. I strongly believe Pat is happy about Carrie being back here. It was just a slip in writing it clearly. :silly:

"My love, I would love to come with you but you must first build me a palace" :D

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
10 May 2011 00:25 - 10 May 2011 00:36 #1109393480 by subject
Replied by subject on topic Re: Injustice
Dear Nenne,

You are SO VERY CORRECT! I am CERTAINLY HAPPY that Carrie is posting here again. My comment:

Sorry, hurting so much, didn't agree with you, that it is great that Carrie is posting again!

I had forgotten to address the fact that I agree with her that it is great. If anyone bothered to look at the commas you will see that even tho poorly written I think it is GREAT! Otherwise, I would have said I DISagreed with her! HELLO! Get real!

I was in terrific pain in my shoulder when I wrote that, so maybe it wasn't understood, but I ASSURE all I AM HAPPY about Carrie posting again.

Hugs.

Pat



P.S. Thank you, Nenne, for at least understanding English! Even tho poorly written, you knew my heart!
Last edit: 10 May 2011 00:36 by subject. Reason: Forgot to state something.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
10 May 2011 08:55 - 10 May 2011 09:02 #1109393487 by webmistress
Replied by webmistress on topic Re: Injustice

P.S. Thank you, Nenne, for at least understanding English! Even tho poorly written, you knew my heart!


Careful where you step, subject - you've made the mistake not the one who's pointing you to it. She's got a heart for Carrie and all the others here, too. :whistle:

And for all:

Besides in another aspect, Claudia is quite right, I observe a lot of thread bumping and hijacking of topics over the last few months. Can I please ask everybody to stick to the actual topic that each thread started out with and keep private news to the private threads or if you'd like to talk about some other works Nat has been doing, go to that thread, please. This is an official forum for things having to do with Nat, and people want to read about him and his work when a thread suggests that it is about that. :kiss:

Not everybody is interested in reading things that don't belong to the topic that was suggested in the headlines - and that's only too logical, right? B) Got a couple of complaints about that lately. :blink: Thanks so much for your patience with an old but experienced moderator. :) We'll all try your hardest to keep things in a "nice orderly queue" ... which actually shouldn't be too hard to do. :woohoo:

Now you may beat the moderator the hardest you like, hit me with your wisdoms. ;) And remember: take my "wisdoms" as a lesson in making things better.... not as a personal offence. :woohoo:

Cheers!

webmistress

"I don't know. I need help. I'm sorry. And something else. [...] I forgot it."
~ Armand Gamache

"If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck." A simplified version of Occam's razor.
Last edit: 10 May 2011 09:02 by webmistress.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
10 May 2011 11:34 - 10 May 2011 11:38 #1109393488 by subject
Replied by subject on topic Re: Injustice
Dear Jessika,

I made NO mistake! I may have written it poorly, however, I DID agree with her that it was great Carrie is back posting here. Just didn't realize I would be graded on my writing technique, especially, as I said when I was in a lot of pain.

I did NOT say she didn't have a heart for Carrie. I said Nenne knew MY heart!

Pat
Last edit: 10 May 2011 11:38 by subject. Reason: Forgot to state something.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
10 May 2011 13:50 - 10 May 2011 15:13 #1109393490 by webmistress
Replied by webmistress on topic Re: Injustice
Again, dearest Pat,

understanding always takes two... and obviously someone didn't "understand"... Think about that for a while before arguing. :kiss: Everybody's got a heart, right?! :unsure:

This is what Claudio wrote:

I don't know why it should not be great that Carry is posting here again. Maybe I didn't understood Pat's comment in the right way.


and this is what you said

Thank you, Nenne, for at least understanding English!


And again: please accept the way people are and the way people understand or misunderstand you. B) That's all. Maybe a good time to read the rules yet again - and dear Pat that's for everybody here and no-one is an exception to those rules. :woohoo:

And now it would be lovely if we could get back to the actual topic of this thread: Injustice the upcoming TV mini series. Nenne wrote

Injustice seem to be very interesting and perhaps very different from what we are used to see Nat in. Can't wait.


I think it will be a very thrilling drama. My guess is that it will be very dark. Maybe that's the reason why they decided not to broadcast it around Easter - which was my guess as an air date. But then again there was a "small wedding", too. So a clever idea to postpone it a bit.

Cheers!

webmistress

"I don't know. I need help. I'm sorry. And something else. [...] I forgot it."
~ Armand Gamache

"If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck." A simplified version of Occam's razor.
Last edit: 10 May 2011 15:13 by webmistress.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
10 May 2011 18:37 - 10 May 2011 18:37 #1109393493 by Amparo
Replied by Amparo on topic Re: Injustice
Dear Jessika. :)
Thank you very much for the lessons you have given us, I put this picture of Garfield that I love it!. Please do not take this the wrong way, it's only to bring a touch of humor :laugh: ;) , after spending a hard day's work. :silly:
Many greetings.
Amparo.


Attachments:
Last edit: 10 May 2011 18:37 by Amparo.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Moderators: webmistress
Time to create page: 0.063 seconds

We use cookies and fonts from outside this website Read our Policy